I have to say that when I first read the rules about Fellowships and the inability of the founder to remove members I was surprised but after some thought I thought it a very good idea. Finally some thought has to go into who you team up with. You would have to get to know someone a little before including them in your group.

Well so much for that idea eh? Seems to me that the folks that didn't pay any attention to who they let into their fellowship are now complaining about the rule when the rest of us were carefull. Hey there are even fellowships that have split in two due to their membership numbers. AND yes they are still run by the individual(s) that set up the first one.

How many of you Fellowship founders were asked if there was a problem with the system. Did we have to make Forum Topics saying that we were fine with things as they were in order to prevent this? And the BIG question.... why do some of our players seem to have an inside track to voice their complaints while the rest of us are left here in forms.

Folks you had the rule to help prevent drama. You caved in to the very people that create the drama.

Oh well.... no skin off my nose. I don't let in people I dont get to know first and who agree with our philosophy about roos. I'm having a blast.... so please don't ruin the game by accident... ask us what we think.